SUBSCRIBE NOW AND SAVE 3 months just 99 ¢/month



Reader's View: Stauber’s votes ignored constituents’ needs

He voted against one of the largest middle-class tax cuts in U.S. history.

Reader's View.jpg

Rep. Pete Stauber recently voted five times against bills proposed or supported by President Joe Biden designed to protect and stimulate our economy and give relief to Stauber’s constituents. Stauber voted against a pandemic stimulus bill, against raising the debt ceiling, against holding Trump operative Steve Bannon in contempt of Congress, against Biden’s infrastructure bill, and against the Build Back Better Act.

This is what Stauber really voted against: stimulus checks; increasing the child care credit; extending unemployment; $20 billion toward COVID-19 vaccinations; $350 billion in state, local, and tribal relief; $30 billion in much-needed relief to restaurants and $120 billion to schools; timely paychecks for 17,000 Minnesota federal workers; timely Social Security checks; extending our debt ceiling to avoid economic disaster; and relief after Hurricane Ida and to farmers following drought-related crop losses, wildfires, and hurricanes.

He voted against one of the largest middle-class tax cuts in U.S. history (after the middle class was largely left out of President Donald Trump’s tax cuts), providing free early education and free community college, child care subsidies so people with children can work, dental care and hearing aids for seniors with Medicare, allowing Medicare to negotiate lower drug prices, the largest-ever investment to combat climate change, four weeks of paid family and medical leave, and efforts to reduce the present rising rate of inflation.

Why doesn’t Stauber support these benefits for his constituents — or those in Biden’s Build Back Better Act that would be at no cost to taxpayers earning less than $400,000 a year? That’s about 98% of Stauber’s constituents. Stauber and other Minnesota Republican representatives voted to deny these benefits to the people of Minnesota.

We need representatives in Congress who ignore politics and instead support constituents' needs.


Michael Herman

Chisago City, Minnesota

Readers' View and Local Views

Letters are limited to 300 words, must be the original work of the author and must be exclusive to the News Tribune. Letters are edited for style, space, accuracy and civility.

Letter writers are limited to one published submission every 30 days.

With rare exceptions, the News Tribune does not publish poetry; letters that are anonymous, libelous or attack other writers; consumer-complaint letters; thank-you letters; or letters generated by political or special-interest campaigns.

We will consider exclusive Local View columns of 600 words or fewer. Authors should possess unique insights, and their commentaries should demonstrate greater knowledge of their subject than letters.

Email submissions to:

Mail to: Readers' Views, Duluth News Tribune, 424 W. First St., Duluth, MN 55802.

Fax to: 218-720-5120.

Include a full name, address and daytime phone number. Only names and hometowns will be published.

What to read next
We are writing to express our dismay and disappointment in the News Tribune for publishing the Jan. 15 letter, “Remove masks, let virus die on its own,” which presented false speculation about vaccinations worsening the COVID-19 epidemic.
Skating rinks at Memorial Park and Irving Park no longer exist for kids.
The whole event was so organized and the staff so friendly and helpful.
No vaccine is 100% effective, but hospitalization and testing records show the unvaccinated are many times more likely to get COVID-19 and even more likely to be hospitalized and die.