Reader's View: Republican deflections devoid of solutions

So far, most of what we’ve seen from congressional Republicans are barricades against any action

Reader's View.jpg
We are part of The Trust Project.

"The ability for people to marry whomever they choose already exists," our esteemed congressional representative, the Honorable Pete Stauber, said in a statement, trying to explain his vote against the Respect for Marriage Act. Since it seems unlikely the congressman can be unaware of the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision to strip women of their reproductive rights — also something that used to already exist and was described as “settled law” by Justice Brett Kavanaugh in his Senate confirmation hearing — this came off as another sorry case of Stauber refusing to take a public stand. Add to that his more recent vote against the Right to Contraception Act and then use your imagination to come up with other civil rights that may soon be in jeopardy if Stauber and his ilk are allowed to have their way with the Constitution.

In all fairness, the congressman followed the above statement by pointing out that Congress should instead be focusing on solving inflation. Nice deflection! How about Stauber telling us his real reason for voting against Respect for Marriage? And since he mentioned inflation, does he have any constructive proposals for that? So far, most of what we’ve seen from congressional Republicans are barricades against any action. Instead, the problem has been forced into the hands of the Federal Reserve, whose only tool (a blunt one, to be sure) is to tamper with interest rates and risk recession and massive unemployment.

Thinking about all this is making me nauseous. In place of photo ops and pontifications, Stauber can get to work on solutions that won’t hurt working people. There are sharper tools to fight inflation, including price controls, profit controls, limits on obscene CEO salaries, and higher taxes on the wealthy. Oh, my heavens, I’d better wash out my mouth with soap!

Guy Roger

Isle, Minnesota


Letters to the editor are a critical part of the community dialogue, and the News Tribune attempts to publish all letters of opinion meeting our requirements.
Letters are limited to 300 words, must be the original work of the author and must be exclusive to the News Tribune. Letters are edited for style, space, accuracy and civility. Letter writers are limited to one published submission every 30 days.
With rare exceptions, the News Tribune does not publish poetry; letters that are anonymous, libelous, or attack other writers; consumer-complaint letters; thank-you letters or letters generated by political or special-interest campaigns.
We will consider exclusive local view columns of about 600 words or fewer. Authors should possess unique insights, and their commentaries should demonstrate greater knowledge of their subject than letters.
Email submissions to: letters@duluthnewscom.

What to read next
Let's commit to making the world better and go back to reporting as accurately as possible by checking facts and providing balanced information.
Why are these statistics always buried in the business sections of newspapers and not on the front page?
In many states, Medicare only covers up to 80% of dialysis treatment, and Medigap plans to cover the remaining expense aren't accessible to patients under 65.
Big spending on school-district facilities has left a trail of broken promises and has wasted an unconscionable amount of wealth and resources.