The opinion expressed in the Sept. 29 Reader's View titled: “Was CDC's split vote 'settled' science?” is based on a logical error.
Knowingly or not, the author constructed their flawed argument against COVID-19 vaccination using partial information and omitting information that would invalidate their argument altogether.
The author leveraged the logical fallacy of omission — a logical error where the complete set of information is omitted to support a predetermined conclusion. The author cited the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) 9-6 vote against recommending a booster dose for people aged 18 to 64 who are at risk of COVID-19 due to their occupation or living situation and suggested that this somehow invalidates the science behind COVID-19 vaccination. This argument is logically disingenuous and dangerously misleading.
Put in context, the ACIP also voted 15-0 in favor of recommending the booster for persons 65 years or older and long-term care residents, 13-2 in favor of recommending the booster for persons 50-64 years with underlying medical conditions, and 9-6 in favor of recommending the booster for persons 18-49 years with underlying medical conditions. And by the way, the CDC director later approved boosters for people aged 18 to 64 working in high-risk occupational and institutional settings.
The science and professional opinion on this matter is quite clear. Vaccination reduces the risk of serious illness resulting from COVID-19. People with underlying medical conditions 18 and older and folks who are 65 and older living in long-term care facilities are strongly encouraged to get the booster.
DNT staff should keep an eye out for these types of logical fallacies before publishing anti-vaccination propaganda. Promoting anti-vaccination propaganda puts our community at risk.
David D. Grandmaison
Readers' View and Local Views
Letters are limited to 300 words, must be the original work of the author and must be exclusive to the News Tribune. Letters are edited for style, space, accuracy and civility.
Letter writers are limited to one published submission every 30 days.
With rare exceptions, the News Tribune does not publish poetry; letters that are anonymous, libelous or attack other writers; consumer-complaint letters; thank-you letters; or letters generated by political or special-interest campaigns.
We will consider exclusive Local View columns of 600 words or fewer. Authors should possess unique insights, and their commentaries should demonstrate greater knowledge of their subject than letters.
Email submissions to: email@example.com
Mail to: Readers' Views, Duluth News Tribune, 424 W. First St., Duluth, MN 55802.
Fax to: 218-720-5120.
Include a full name, address and daytime phone number. Only names and hometowns will be published.