SUBSCRIBE NOW AND SAVE 3 months just 99 ¢/month

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

In its words: Minnesota's teachers union opposes the Page Amendment

“The proposed amendment would remove the requirement for a ‘uniform’ system of public education from the state constitution."

111321.op.dnt.covertoon2.jpg
Nate Beeler / Cagle Cartoons

“Education Minnesota announced (in January 2020) its opposition to a proposed amendment to the Minnesota Constitution that would remove the explicit obligation on the state to fund a uniform system of public education for every child.

“‘Every Minnesota student deserves to learn in a building with a nurse, a counselor and class sizes small enough for teachers to give individual attention,’ said Denise Specht, president of Education Minnesota. ‘Many students are missing those things now. Imagine how much worse it would get if the funding requirement was removed from the state constitution.’

“The proposed amendment would remove the requirement for a ‘uniform’ system of public education from the state constitution. This strategy paves the way for taxpayer-funded vouchers for private schools, which may discriminate against certain students. Conservative think tanks and advocacy groups, including the American Legislative Exchange Council, have advocated for similar changes to state constitutions around the country.

“‘The public schools paid for by the taxpayers should be available to every Minnesota family no matter where they are from, how they pray, whether their children have special needs, or who they love,’ Specht said. ‘Educators will resist this move to bring our state closer to vouchers, just as we’ve resisted the parts of the (American Legislative Exchange Council) agenda that supports polluters, union-busters and corporate welfare.’

“The amendment proposed by Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis President Neel Kashkari, the 2014 Republican nominee for governor of California, and former Minnesota Supreme Court Justice Alan Page creates a situation in which any parent could bring a lawsuit against the state and their school.

ADVERTISEMENT

“‘This amendment favors parents who can afford to hire attorneys to advocate for their own children, probably at the expense of families with fewer resources. That is the opposite of education equity,’ Specht said. ‘Minnesota schools are failing too many students of color and students in poverty. We shouldn’t expect their families to wait on the courts, which will take years. Educators have solutions ready and waiting for funding. The Legislature needs to fully fund public education. It needs to do it right now’.”

— Education Minnesota in a statement on Jan. 8, 2020

Denise Specht.jpg
Denise Specht, Education Minnesota

Related Topics: EDUCATION
Opinion by Education Minnesota
What to read next
From the column: "Demand for gasoline and diesel will not disappear overnight, but it will drop. As this happens, small oil refineries will become uneconomic. Superior is ahead of the curve because the refinery killed itself. Time to move on."
"We wouldn’t publish a letter saying climate change isn’t real, for example, as such a statement is inaccurate. We will, however, publish — and we do routinely — letters with which we disagree, even strongly disagree."
From the column: "To alleviate negatives, it’s critical we teach the proper use of social media, implement age restrictions, and hold companies accountable for the misinformation spread on their sites."
From the column: "I fervently hope our government is doing whatever it takes to get these people who have served as our allies safely resettled as soon as possible."