We see that you have javascript disabled. Please enable javascript and refresh the page to continue reading local news. If you feel you have received this message in error, please contact the customer support team at 1-833-248-7801.



Other View: Spending bill's EV subsidies won't work

From the editorial: "Democrats' desire to shield labor unions and domestic automakers from competition will end up making the EV handouts in this bill all but useless."

The Northland’s first solar-powered electric vehicle charging station was officially opened in June 2017 in Duluth. (File / News Tribune)
We are part of The Trust Project.

The ill-named Inflation Reduction Act is being touted by Democrats and others as, among other things, the fast track to a zero-emissions future.

They argue the slowing manufacturing industry and curtailed automotive production calls for more government stimulation, particularly so electric vehicles (EVs) are able to take hold and lead the nation into a green-energy future.

Key to this, they say, are tax credits to make EVs more affordable for low- to middle-income buyers.

But it will be fortunate if the package moves even a single EV off the lot.

Stipulations in the bill will make the majority of EVs currently on the market ineligible for subsidies. The unfilled promises will confuse consumers and make it more difficult for automotive companies to meet the ambitious requirement to transform to a majority-electric fleet by 2030.


Roughly 75% of the electric-vehicles models available for purchase in the U.S. — including battery, plug-in hybrid, and fuel-cell EVs — won't qualify for the subsidies, at least in the first few years, according to Michigan economist Patrick Anderson.

Once additional sourcing requirements for parts go into effect, Anderson says no electric-vehicle models will qualify.

The law requires that electric vehicles be assembled in North America. But assembly capacity in the region is limited, meaning most EVs are still being built overseas. A more realistic phase-in of the domestic content requirements for battery components, minerals, and other parts would have made the tax credit more attainable.

The bill also imposes price caps on EVs that are lower than the typical selling price of an electric vehicle, creating an additional impediment on the retail end. The government says it will give the credits directly to dealers. But if they’re forced to offer EVs at lower than market value, they still lose.

There are also income thresholds to qualify for the tax breaks: $150,000 for single filers and $300,000 for joint filers. Income will be calculated on a modified adjusted gross basis, which is an obscure formula that typically means adding back deductions. Again, that means fewer consumers will qualify.

The gap between what is being advertised and the benefits car consumers would actually see as a result of this legislation is likely to disappoint American consumers, many of whom will lose the credits they're currently receiving for EV purchases.

“Americans who would otherwise receive the credit today will no longer be able to take advantage of this financial incentive to purchase an EV,” said John Bozzella, CEO of the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, in a blog post. “The $7,500 credit might exist on paper, but no vehicles will qualify for this purchase incentive over the next few years.”

The automotive industry and its regulators have set ambitious targets for transitioning internal-combustion-engine vehicles to electric. Bozzella notes the actual disincentives that constitute the “tax subsidies” will be a major setback to collective goals of 40% to 50% EV fleets by 2030.


We've opposed the tax credits for electric-vehicle purchases since their inception. Buyers of EVs tend to be in the higher income brackets and should be able to pay for their own cars and trucks.

But if they're going to be offered, they should be available to all Americans, not just the ones who buy EVs built by union workers in North America.

Democrats' desire to shield labor unions and domestic automakers from competition will end up making the EV handouts in this bill all but useless.

— The Detroit News

What to read next
From the editorial: "If councilors want to take a stand on the current contract negotiations between our hospitals and nurses, it could follow the lead of Duluth Area Chamber ... President Matt Baumgartner, who, in August, penned a commentary for the News Tribune urging federal mediation, if necessary."
From the editorial: Minnesota will likely be a national cautionary tale about lax oversight of public programs and taxpayer dollars."
From the editorial: "Before casting any ballot, it’s good to be educated on the issues and candidates. The forums this coming week are valuable opportunities."