Statewide View: Can't celebrate just yet for historic preservation in Minnesota

From the column: "Assuming the historic tax credit is extended into the next decade, the Legislature will have done its part. Then it will be up to the people of Minnesota to figure out how to make the historic tax credit work for them and their communities and how to keep more old buildings out of landfills."

Munger Terrace is one of many buildings in Duluth that used a state historic tax credit program to help fund a redevelopment project. Efforts are underway at the Minnesota Capitol to extend the life of the program.
Steve Kuchera /
We are part of The Trust Project.

Things are looking rosier this month for Minnesota’s historic-preservation advocates. Gov. Tim Walz proclaimed May as Historic Preservation Mont h. The State Historic Preservation Office released a new Statewide Preservation Plan outlining goals for the next decade. And the Legislature is poised to extend the Minnesota Historic Structure Rehabilitation Tax Credit , which provides a 20% tax credit (often paired with a 20% federal tax credit) for the costs of qualified historic building rehabilitations.

Although the House and Senate historic tax credit bills differed as of this week — the House extends the program for eight years and allows the credit to be taken as a single refund while the Senate bill makes the credit permanent but retains the current five-year refund allocation schedule — those of us who champion preservation and historic building reuse have good reason to be optimistic.

However, that stubborn Charlie Brown-ish tendency that clouds even very good news has been keeping our celebrations in check. There are three reasons why.

One, the House and Senate bills were to head next to conference committee to be discussed as part of a much larger tax bill that must be finalized before Sunday. Those negotiations are complicated even under normal circumstances. Add in a record budget surplus, the uncertainty of inflation, the war in Ukraine, and polar-opposite political views around taxing and spending, and we worry the historic tax credit — despite being the one thing everyone at the Legislature seems to agree on with broad, bipartisan, statewide support — will get mired in end-of-session politics.

Two, systemic inequities persist in access to historic tax credits, and this program has not yet reached some of the communities that could most benefit from its economic and cultural impacts, both in greater Minnesota and in the urban neighborhoods of our core cities. Repurposing and rehabilitating historic buildings, many of which have suffered decades of neglect, is challenging and complicated work. Finding the financial resources to undertake the projects is even more difficult. Historic tax credits are awarded only after a project is completed and put in service, meaning that the project developers need access to cash — and a lot of it — to cover design, legal, financing, and construction costs for the first two to three years.


Rethos supports a bill introduced by Rep. Mohamud Noor, chair of the House Workforce and Jobs Committee, that would provide grants for new real estate developers who are BIPOC, women, or rural. Chair Noor’s Emerging Developer Grant Program would pave the way for more people from underrepresented communities to participate in historic-rehab projects. But it is not included in the Senate Jobs bill, and we are not certain it will make it through conference committee negotiations.

Finally, demolition is still the easiest and cheapest option for too many communities faced with aging building stock. Public redevelopment grants — our tax dollars at work — disproportionately go to demolishing buildings rather than providing financial assistance to people who want to fix them up and keep them in use. Even though we can point to substantial economic benefits as a result of rehabilitation , the true costs of demolition, in terms of lost opportunities and environmental impacts, have not been thoroughly researched and quantified. Recently, attention has shifted to deconstruction as an alternative to demolition.

During this Preservation Month, Rethos has been hosting a three-part webinar series of d econstruction masterclasses to help people from throughout Minnesota and beyond become more familiar with strategies to keep useful building materials out of landfills. Grants are available in Hennepin and Ramsey counties to help with the costs of deconstruction , but not for rehabilitation or adaptive reuse.

Assuming the historic tax credit is extended into the next decade, the Legislature will have done its part. Then it will be up to the people of Minnesota to figure out how to make the historic tax credit work for them and their communities and how to keep more old buildings out of landfills.

We should start by recognizing existing historic buildings as the unique assets they are, focusing a little less on what has been and much more on what can be. Can empty schools be repurposed as housing for seniors? Can the second and third stories of downtown buildings be fixed up as apartments, providing another source of income for people who weigh keeping their small, local businesses afloat against the costs of maintaining their historic building? Can we embrace the idea that “ new ideas need old buildings ” as resources are poured into creating new jobs and opportunities in tech ?

The state of Minnesota has enacted policies to do all of these things, but it is up to the people to use the tools presented to us to make our communities — and the buildings we inhabit — as strong and resilient as possible.

Erin Hanafin Berg is director of the Rethos Policy Institute, a program of Rethos: Places Reimagined. Rethos is a St. Paul-based nonprofit dedicated to historic preservation and the reuse of old buildings.

Erin Hanafin Berg.jpg
Erin Hanafin Berg

What to read next
From the column: "Working at Ordean East cured my empty-nester impoverishment. It also gave me a bright awakening to what pulse the newer middle-school generation likes and prefers."
From the column: "We are talking about a clearly expanded and efficient use of a key central area of Duluth rather than the limited, single-highway use that exists now."
From the column: "Banning conversation about sexuality and gender identity erases LGBTQ+ identity, history and culture; more than that, it erases the students themselves. In effect, these young people are canceled. They are seen as disposable."
From the column: "Asian students being denied admission are part of a group that also faced severe discrimination in the past."