Pro/Con: Flavored-tobacco products can help smokers quit; banning them has 'little impact' on youth smoking

From the column: "Unfortunately, states and localities — including Minnesota and Duluth — continue to utilize flavor bans as a weapon to reduce tobacco use. "

David Fitzsimmons / Cagle Cartoons

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration recently made headlines with its marketing approval of four flavored oral tobacco products manufactured by Verve. While those products had been discontinued before the announcement, the FDA’s decision reaffirmed that flavored tobacco and nicotine products can help people transition away from using more harmful products like combustible cigarettes. It will hopefully discourage policymakers from pursuing flavor bans for tobacco harm-reduction products that provide smokers with alternatives that can help them quit smoking for good.

Before approving the oral tobacco products, the FDA completed a comprehensive review of scientific evidence, which showed these products were “appropriate for the protection of the public health.” Mitch Zeller, director of the FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products, explained, “Evidence shows these products could help addicted smokers who use the most harmful combusted products completely switch to a product with potentially fewer harmful chemicals.”

Transitioning smokers away from combustible cigarettes will result in better health care outcomes.

RELATED: Pro/Con: Avoid flavored tobacco; as the FDA says, 'There are no safe tobacco products'

Unfortunately, states and localities — including Minnesota and Duluth — continue to utilize flavor bans as a weapon to reduce tobacco use. And while tobacco flavor is often an exception to these flavor bans, surveys have shown that current smokers looking to quit cigarettes prefer flavored tobacco and nicotine products.


For example, a 2020 study found a correlation between non-tobacco flavors and smoking cessation for adults, while also concluding that youth vaping uptake saw no significant difference between non-tobacco and tobacco-flavored products.

Additionally, the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco published a study this year highlighting that “sweet” flavors such as candy or fruit-flavored nicotine products were more likely than any other flavor to help people transition away from smoking. At NicoKick, our 2020 consumer data showed that among those who regularly used nicotine pouches, 59% were smokers who have quit, and fruity-flavored products were the most popular choice for former smokers.

These flavored tobacco and nicotine products, which are scientifically shown to help transition smokers away from combustible cigarettes, are the same ones being targeted by new flavor bans across the country. So far, more than 100 U.S. jurisdictions have banned or restricted the sales of flavored tobacco products, according to Truth Initiative. They include Chicago, Los Angeles County, Minneapolis, Oakland, Sacramento, San Francisco, and Duluth. And more cities are expected to pass flavor bans in the coming years, with one being debated in Denver right now.

Tobacco flavor bans are ostensibly aimed at reducing youth usage, but the FDA’s approval of the four variations of mint flavors for oral nicotine products reaffirms how these flavors can entice adult smokers without encouraging increased youth usage. The data support this.

So, banning these flavors takes away a critical off-ramp for adult smokers, with little impact on youth usage rates.

If policymakers want to improve public health and reduce the overall number of smokers, they must acknowledge, like the FDA has, that tobacco harm-reduction products are a healthier alternative to help Americans quit smoking. The evidence has been clear for years that these products are better for consumers than traditional cigarettes, and flavored tobacco and nicotine products play an important role in providing smokers a stepping stone to quit cigarettes for good. Elected officials should not impose arbitrary flavor bans that make it more likely that smokers keep smoking, which is an outcome that no public health official would support.

Markus Lindblad is head of external affairs at the Haypp Group (, an e-commerce company in Sweden that promotes healthier smoking-product alternatives.


Markus Lindblad.jpeg
Markus Lindblad

What To Read Next
From the column: "There will be more rich lawyers, more clogged courtrooms, and fewer resources available to energy firms that do seek to pivot to better alternatives."
From the column: "Nobody wants to produce the necessary material for the energy transition at the expense of the natural environment that we all love and enjoy."
From the column: "The challenge reaches far beyond Duluth. There is an urgent need for state and federal resources, on the scale we invest in other aspects of our children’s education."
From the column (sound familiar?): "With its vast and diverse natural resources, Canada is well-positioned to play a critical role in meeting this global demand."