Pro/Con: Are political conventions necessary? Yes, they matter, so keep the party going


Even if virtually, they’re getting ready to blow up the balloons for next month’s Democratic and Republican national conventions. Ah, the balloons! The classic grand finale drop symbolizes the end of these quadrennial gatherings, much the way the Times Square ball drop is an essential part of New Year’s Eve.

And that, critics point out, is what’s wrong with modern political conventions. (Although as a former network journalist, I can attest TV loves that part most of all.) Sure, the balloons are pretty and fun; but in a larger sense, opponents say, they signify the worst of the four-day events: It’s entertainment over substance.

Drop the show-biz razzmatazz — and the balloons, they argue. Replace all the songs and warm-and-fuzzy videos with the fact-based information voters need to make informed decisions on Election Day.

Yet that’s the very approach that made public television the broadcast powerhouse it is today. Have you checked C-Span’s standings in the ratings lately? Well-intentioned as it is, the idea is dead on arrival. With more entertainment options and less free time available than ever before, the last thing most hard-working Americans want is to spend two weeks every four summers watching a parade of politicians bloviating in prime time.

But the premise is flawed at a much deeper level. Because proponents for more substantive events completely miss the point. A modern political convention isn’t about the folks watching at home. It’s a party for the party itself. And under the gala exterior, a lot of important activity goes on that’s never caught by TV cameras.


Admittedly, the 19th-century reasons for why conventions were created no longer exist. The primary process has turned delegates into mere functionaries whose key duty is making the presidential and vice-presidential nominations official. The party platform, a declaration stating each party’s stand on important issues, has been irrelevant ever since Bill Clinton simply disregarded the Democrats’ edition in 1992. The wimpy, generic drivel that replaced it now reads more like one of Stuart Smalley’s “Daily Affirmations” than a political manifesto.

So, why bother holding political conventions at all?

Because the real work done there isn’t conducted on the convention floor. It takes place over tables in restaurants, in the corners of hospitality suites, and at hotel bars. The delegates and alternates who meet during those four days are politicians, after all. And they gather to do much more than ratify the results that primary voters decided months earlier in picking the presidential nominee.

These often casual get-togethers are where ideas are exchanged, where information about new ways to reach and affect voters is passed along, and where knowledge is transferred. They’re where alliances are formed, not just at the national level but often also for gubernatorial and congressional contests as well. They’re where contacts are made that can lead to new fundraising resources, emerging political talent is discovered, and yes, where deals are even sometimes struck. They are, in short, where the nuts and bolts yeoman work of a political organization is conducted.

How that will play out this year is anyone’s guess since, more than anything else, a political convention provides a vitally important opportunity for providing that vanishing quality: one-on-one human contact. Sure, most of the things I just described can be conducted via email, text messaging, and phone calls. But they don’t allow you to look into the other person’s eyes and gauge the sincerity (or lack of it) behind their words.

President Lyndon Johnson once said of political conversations: “The most important thing is what the other person is trying not to tell you.” Political types speak a language all their own, where volumes are said through a simple nod, a wink, a knowing smile. You don’t get that via any electronic communications medium.

Finally, the two-party system is responsible for much of America’s stability and success over the past two centuries. And the convention is a key ingredient in keeping a political party strong. Delegates return home energized, enthused, and eager to campaign for — and against — their favorite candidates and causes. Robust political organizations not only make for better political campaigns, they strengthen our republic itself as well.

So, please, forget the idea of transforming political conventions into venues for producing better-educated voters. That would be a fool’s errand. Better to use all that hot air to blow up all those balloons instead. And yeah, keep the balloons, too.


J. Mark Powell is vice president of communications at Ivory Tusk Consulting in Lexington, South Carolina, and is the author of the political thriller, “Tell it Like Tupper.” He wrote this originally for

J. Mark Powell.jpg
J. Mark Powell

What To Read Next
From the column: "The challenge reaches far beyond Duluth. There is an urgent need for state and federal resources, on the scale we invest in other aspects of our children’s education."
From the column (sound familiar?): "With its vast and diverse natural resources, Canada is well-positioned to play a critical role in meeting this global demand."
From the column: "Sadly, Holly’s voice had been stilled all too soon. At least his physical voice had. In a larger sense, though, it continued — and grew."
From the column: "Five years and just a few short days later — on Feb. 9, 1964 — the music experienced a rebirth ... (with) the Beatles ... (on) 'The Ed Sullivan Show'."