BAGLEY, Minn. - A judge Tuesday, Oct. 9, dismissed the case against three environmental activists who were charged with damaging a northern Minnesota pipeline in 2016.
The defendants, who have referred to themselves as "valve turners," shut off the valves of two Enbridge Energy Co. pipelines near Leonard in Clearwater County in October 2016 as a way to protest the oil industry's contribution to climate change. The action was part of a coordinated effort across several states.
Emily Johnston of Seattle was charged with causing property damage to a pipeline. Both Annette Klapstein, of Bainbridge Island, Wash., and Benjamin Joldersma, of Seattle, had been charged with aiding the property damage of a pipeline.
"We are obviously relieved that the criminal charges have now been dismissed, but there is a lot of work to do with regard to climate change and the underlying issues," said Lauren Regan, one of the three defense attorneys in the case.
Like the defendants, their legal team traveled thousands of miles to fight the battle in the small northwoods town. Regan works with the Civil Liberties Defense Center in Eugene, Ore. The team also consisted of Kelsey Skaggs from the Climate Defense Project in San Francisco and Twin-Cities based attorney Timothy Phillips.
But Tuesday's dismissal did not garner unanimous approval from those watching from afar.
"Today's decision is irresponsible, and sends the message that protesters are free to engage in reckless, illegal, and dangerous behavior that puts Minnesotans' safety at risk," said state Rep. Pat Garofalo, R-Farmington, who chairs the Legislature's House Job Growth and Energy Affordability Committee. "Protesters have already shut down freeways, closed airports and stopped trains. Now they are going after our energy infrastructure. This is a very dangerous action that needs to be corrected in the next legislative session."
The judge, Robert Tiffany, dismissed the case at the defense attorneys' request midway through the second day of trial after County Attorney Alan Rogalla rested his case.
Tiffany granted the dismissal based on arguments from the defense attorneys, one of which was that the prosecution failed to prove the defendants had damaged the actual pipeline rather than merely the chains and locks bound to the pipeline valve.
Under cross-examination, Enbridge supervisor Bill Palmer testified that simply shutting off the valve would not have caused any damage to the pipeline.
It did, however, cause significant loss of production for the company, which was essentially the intent of the valve turners. Palmer testified that each of the two pipes the defendants turned off was capable of transporting as many as 33,000 gallons of oil an hour. Since the company had to shut down the pipelines for eight hours afterward, the valve turners effectively delayed the transportation of more than half a million gallons of oil.
Rogalla also showed a video the defendants filmed the day of the incident. It showed the defendants approach the valve site and then call an Enbridge representative on the phone to explain what they had done and why they did it.
"For the sake of climate justice and to ensure the future for human civilization, we must immediately halt the extraction (and) burning of Canadian tar sands," defendant Joldersma could be heard saying on the video while on the phone with Enbridge.
The defense had intended to invoke the "necessity defense," which would have allowed them to claim they performed the crime as a way to prevent greater harm. Since the judge dismissed the charges early, the defendants did not get to use the defense they had planned.
"I also admit that I am disappointed that we did not get to put on the trial that we hoped for," Johnston said.
Requesting the dismissal also may have been an early exit strategy for the defense since it had sustained a blow earlier in the day. Tiffany ruled the defense's expert witnesses could not testify on the effects of climate change, explaining it could prejudice the jury.
The valve turners have been at least somewhat successful in communicating their core message in the two years since they carried out their plan against pipelines. In February, the New York Times Magazine published a 6,400-word story on the environmental activists who were involved in the coordinated act of civil disobedience, including both Johnston and Klapstein. A writer from Wired Magazine was on hand for Tuesday's proceedings.
Once the decision was announced, applause and celebration broke out in the courtroom, which had extra seating to accommodate the crowd. All told, there were about 65 people in the audience of the small courtroom, according to the courthouse staff.
The defendants and their legal team fielded questions on the courthouse steps shortly after the judge made his announcement.
Joldersma stood with his 8-year-old daughter, indicating it was partly for her generation that he helped take part in the valve-turner activism.
Klapstein said the time frame in which climate change can be reversed is continuing to narrow and they will continue to work toward mitigating its effects.
"We did this two years ago, and things have only got massively worse since then," Klapstein said. "Would I rule out civil disobedience again? Absolutely not."