Subscription Services

The Northland's No. 1 news Web site — 4,596,436 pageviews in October 2009.

print Print     e-mail E-mail     share Share
Published July 01, 2009

What do you think of the state Supreme Court's decision to give the U.S. Senate seat to Al Franken? talk about it

What are your thoughts on this topic? Submit your comments and read the opinions of others.

Please Log in to share your comments on this topic

« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 next »

July 21, 2009 4:50 PM
bob w. Duluth, MN  


Louis N. Minneapolis, MN, choice of words do not make a man. If you can sit there and blame everything that went wrong during the Bush administration onto GW Bush you are a sad individual. GW Bush has faults, this I agree, but I have enough intelligence to know Congress makes laws and budgets, not the President. I place more blame on 535 other indiviuals from both parties. Fearful is not even close to what we as a nation will go through for the next two years with the wolves guarding the deer herd.

Report a Violation

July 21, 2009 4:11 PM
Louis N. Minneapolis, MN  


Z, what will you do when you run out of fingers? bob, I accepted long ago
that Bush became president, what I was fearful of at the time was the disaster
that occurred over those eight years. You then agree then that Pawlenty became
Governor by default. I always did and still do sleep well at night, but I have renewed
Confidence in my government.

Report a Violation

July 20, 2009 8:40 PM
bob w. Duluth, MN  


louis n. Minneapolis, MN, no I will not agree Bush was appointed, as per laws in place he won against Gore by Electoral votes. Pawlenty won by to quote you, the most votes. Biggest difference here is I will not lay wake each night crying because we now have a Senator in MN named Franken, verses liberals still crying about 2000 election.

Report a Violation

July 20, 2009 8:23 PM
DR Z. Duluth, MN  


That's 5, louie.

Report a Violation

July 20, 2009 7:37 PM
louis n. Minneapolis, MN  


Good bob w, we've finally got your attention. You are right, Al did not get a majority, just the most votes. Now I am sure you will agree that Pawlenty became governor "by default" as well as Bush in 2004, but Bush did not even get the most votes in 2000, so I am sure that you would agree that Bush was appointed once and won by default once.

Report a Violation

July 20, 2009 4:35 PM
bob w. Duluth, MN  


To somewhat quote the liberals, he didn't get the majority of the people to vote for him, so he is not the choice of the majority, Franken just happens to get to be the Senator from MN by default. Now Moderator, can we find something new to complain about, please!

Report a Violation

July 19, 2009 7:41 PM
Louis N. Minneapolis, MN  


Z, the majority agree with me, it would appear the real silent majority"
is liberal. Dan, you have the strangest defintion of "common sense" I have
encountered, the fact that your "internet searches" always turn up question-
able conservative results defies your claim. Besides, all too often your sources
turn out to be bogus and your positions illogical.

Report a Violation

July 19, 2009 8:20 AM
G L. Longwood, FL  


When anyone who is not a democrat or a liberal succeeds at anything, a liberal will tell you it's because they cheated.

Report a Violation

July 19, 2009 8:07 AM
Louis N. Minneapolis, MN  


Again Dan you didn't read my full statement, no use pointing that out to you though. I do think the last election kind of settles the majority thing for now. Your response, of course, ignores the main points I brought up about your "common sense". Maybe, Dan, you can explain what is "common sense" about your failure to accept that Al Franken won and that the supreme court did NOT "give" him the election?

Report a Violation

July 19, 2009 7:26 AM
Dan H.


The majority of who, Louis? You and Jim? The rest of the trees out in the woods?

Report a Violation

« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 next »

Comments posted on this page do not reflect opinions of Forum Communications Company. Forum Communications Company does not endorse and is not responsible for any statement, opinion, advice given or made. All replies are subject to approval and must follow Forum Communications Company guidelines concerning statements of libel, personal attacks or defamation of character. Replies in the "Talk About It" section that criticize a person by name may not be posted, unless that person is openly involved in a public issue. Comments written in all capital letters or bold print will not be considered for inclusion in the forum.